Pre-investment due diligence
Schedule & risk control
Decision alignment
Factory modernization planning
CAPEX scope & risk
On-site execution lead
SOP/DV/PV cadence
OEM–Tier-1 closure
Evidence-based go/no-go
Compliance-driven delivery
Consortium interface lead
Arctic test readiness
Starting a new program — or already moving? We plug in with ownership, cadence and execution capacity where timing, quality and accountability must hold.
Need a critical role for 3–12 months? We plug in as an accountable lead — not just extra hands.
Component Lead / Lead Engineer- FuSa — integration & closure
Kickoff: Freeze interfaces early; align Tier-1 handshake, owners, and change-control gates.
Recovery: Turn chaos into a closure loop: evidence, sign-off, and release-ready handover.
Delivers:
Interface spec locked and owned: explicit assumptions, owners, versioned interface agreement (OEM/Tier-1)
Change impact control: change requests tied to DV/PV/SOP gates, decisions dated and owned
Closure discipline: weekly blocker burn-down, fix/verify loop, gate evidence pack + clean handover
Program Owner — SOP cadence & decision ownership
Kickoff: Set governance, owners and gate rhythm so decisions don’t stall later.
Recovery: Unblock stalled decisions and close critical-path threads fast.
Delivers:
Weekly cadence: owners, blockers, closures + gate rhythm (SOP/DV/PV/PPAP)
Decision log + escalation: dated decisions, named owners, impact clear, “almost decided” closed
Supplier alignment: readiness vs. gates, interface commitments, recovery plan
Test Engineer / Test Manager — DV/PV execution & sign-off
Kickoff: Build a realistic test plan (capacity, scope, evidence) tied to gates.
Recovery: Restore evidence-based go/no-go when validation compresses.
Delivers:
Test plan → reality: scope, priority, capacity, schedule, risks visible weekly (DV/PV)
Evidence-based status: pass/fail trends, blockers, retest rules, sign-off logic
Gate support: DV/PV readiness snapshots + escalation when risk climbs, aligned to SOP decisions
Standards we deliver in — and outcomes the work has earned
Three examples of recovery and kickoff — cadence, closure, evidence, readiness.
Situation: SOP (launch) risk climbed fast; interfaces shaky; issues bounced without closure.
What we changed: Weekly owner cadence + decision log locked; evidence pack enforced for go/no-go.
Outcome: Critical path regained control; gates re-aligned; recovery executed to target.
Proof tags: Critical path control | Decision closure | Evidence-led gates.
Situation: Validation window shrank; test capacity tight; results didn’t drive decisions.
What we changed: Test plan converted into weekly reality view; evidence-led sign-off rules introduced.
Outcome: Readiness became explicit; blockers surfaced early; go/no-go moved from opinion to data.
Proof tags: Validation readiness | Blockers visible | Evidence-led sign-off.
Situation: CAPEX scope kept moving; delivery risk rose; stakeholders pulled priorities apart.
What we changed: Phased master plan locked; weekly scope/risk decisions run; on-site execution led.
Outcome: Delivery stabilized; decisions closed on time; implementation progressed without drift.
Proof tags: Scope control | Decision cadence | On-site delivery lead.
Tell us what’s at stake (timing, quality, accountability) and where you are right now. We’ll suggest the fastest next step — kickoff or recovery.
Veli-Matti Ylijääskö
TPM Consulting Oy
VAT: FI32539385
Vennikuja, Rovaniemi, Finland
+358 4578395556
Online billing address 003732539385
Veli-Matti.ylijaasko@tpm-consulting.fi
